Latvia is used by the ‘austerians’ as a case showing that hard and painful austerity can get an economy out of recession. This policy brief argues the opposite and shows that what actually happened in Latvia is that policymakers decided not to continue but to break with the policy of austerity. This made it possible for Latvia to get out of a vicious spiral of austerity causing a depression and thereby leading to even more austerity.

After having looked in greater detail at what really happened in Latvia, in terms of both the policy that was actually implemented and the results it generated, the author pleads that Europe should urgently apply a moratorium on new fiscal austerity measures so as to avoid deepening the recession many of its member states are already suffering. Restoring growth dynamics needs to come first and consolidation of public finances can only follow afterwards.

Table of contents

Full text

Related content

After the ‘Hairdressing agreement’, the EPSU case

In the coming months, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) will reach a decision on the case European Public Service Union (EPSU) and Goudriaan v Commission (C-928/19 P), which could be crucial for the future of the EU social dialogue. The EPSU case initially originated from the Commission’s refusal to transmit a proposal for a Council Decision... Find out more

Nicolas Fleury

Validation of non-formal and informal learning: new opportunities for all?

The aim of this Policy Brief is to highlight the key issues concerning recognition of skills as embodied in the project Actors, practices and challenges concerning non-formal and informal learning and its validation and proposes ways of developing such validation.In the context of a growing need to raise levels of education, enhance skills and... Find out more