Contact-tracing apps to combat the Covid-19 pandemic have increasingly been mentioned as useful tools to accompany and contribute to a return to normality despite the many ethical and legal questions they raise. The pressure exerted by business circles and lobbies to restart and ‘save the economy’ has been intense. What started as a public health crisis morphed into an economic crisis and we are now faced with a ‘trick-or-treat’ choice: accept to ‘pay the price’ and use invasive tracing apps, and by so doing facilitate a gradual reopening of business, or fight for privacy and delay the return to normality. This policy brief offers new arguments to reject this binary choice and argues that:

  • Using contact-tracing apps to fight the spread of the virus is intrusive and threatens EU citizens' right to privacy. To defend this right, key rules and principles of EU law, in particular those embedded in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and e-Privacy Directive, must be upheld.
  • Claiming that defending privacy undermines the fight against the pandemic and the reopening of the economy is a mistake: for contact-tracing apps to be at all effective, they must be voluntarily and freely downloaded and used by a majority of citizens. This will only happen if citizens are confident that their privacy is not at stake. The two battles, for privacy and against COVID-19, are complementary, not opposed.
  • Contact-tracing apps should only be used in the workplace if specific requirements are met (regarding, among other things, the purpose of the app, the type of data collected, how long the data is kept, whether workers give their consent, and whether trade unions are involved).
  • Finally, it is of the utmost importance that contact-tracing apps are not used to sow the seeds of a future culture of hyper surveillance in the workplace.

Table of contents

Covid-19 contact-tracing apps: how to prevent privacy from becoming the next victim_2020

Related content

Ana Podvršič, Joachim Becker, Dóra Piroska, ...

Mitigating the Covid-19 effect

This paper analyses the economic policy-making in the first phase of the epidemic in five Central Europe countries, Austria, Czechia... Find out more

David Natali

Pensions in the age of Covid-19

Pension policy is not safe from the potentially dramatic consequences of the pandemic. But in terms of pension politics, the pandemic also... Find out more

EU-western Balkans relations at the time of the Covid-19 crisis

This issue of the SEER Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe for 2020 focuses on EU-western Balkans relations at the time... Find out more

Essential but unprotected: highly mobile workers in the EU during the Covid-19 pandemic

The Covid-19 pandemic has shown that highly mobile workers who frequently move either within or in and out of the European Union (EU) are... Find out more

When work affects health from one generation to the next

The use of substances that are harmful to reproductive health (“reprotoxins”) is widespread in European workplaces. EU legislation regulates... Find out more

Wim Eshuis

Reducing the numbers of occupational victims requires an alternative prevention policy

The European legislation on occupational health and safety has failed to achieve any substantial reduction in the incidence of work-related... Find out more